Originally downloading seemed to panic the music industry & they seemed to disregard it. As a result the vacuum was quickly packed with file sharing sites, which prospered. Finally the trade woke up to it and began aggressively going after both sites & individuals through the courts. In the end it's theft of intellectual property. Especially in the United states the music industry continues to be lobbying extensively in Washington, along with high profile legal cases.
Undoubtedly you'll have read about some of the lawsuits recently. Various parts if the media, both new and old are well informed of certain cases such as families being sued for well over a hundred grand. These cases are clearly meant to send out a message & try to reduce the problem. Even though it does seem very heavy handed.
At the same time as all this activity was happening, behind the scenes the music business had recognised the necessity of getting into the download market even if it was just to counteract the decrease in album and CD sales. The innovators were Apple, who created a system that was simple to use and inexpensive for even the most technophobic. At the same time the approach of giving away something for free to increase sales was recognised & implemented. They help to widen the artists' fan base, which can be exploited to make money.
So the big question is; is the double-pronged action working? It seems to be up to a point. Although sales of CD's have dropped along with record companies profits, the number of people seeing live music is increasing. So bands are able to combat the falling royalties from CD sales with money from live gigs.
The traditional ways of talent spotting have evolved to recognise the internet. No more going round small venues looking at bands. Now thanks to facebook, youtube etc the bands can be found easily with followers and downloads so they can be signed up. This suggests a fan base in place, which is the nearest you can get to a sure thing in music.
With the pleasure of hearing live music, seeing bands & singers doing it live then why bother with illegal downloads & ruin the risk of a criminal record.
Undoubtedly you'll have read about some of the lawsuits recently. Various parts if the media, both new and old are well informed of certain cases such as families being sued for well over a hundred grand. These cases are clearly meant to send out a message & try to reduce the problem. Even though it does seem very heavy handed.
At the same time as all this activity was happening, behind the scenes the music business had recognised the necessity of getting into the download market even if it was just to counteract the decrease in album and CD sales. The innovators were Apple, who created a system that was simple to use and inexpensive for even the most technophobic. At the same time the approach of giving away something for free to increase sales was recognised & implemented. They help to widen the artists' fan base, which can be exploited to make money.
So the big question is; is the double-pronged action working? It seems to be up to a point. Although sales of CD's have dropped along with record companies profits, the number of people seeing live music is increasing. So bands are able to combat the falling royalties from CD sales with money from live gigs.
The traditional ways of talent spotting have evolved to recognise the internet. No more going round small venues looking at bands. Now thanks to facebook, youtube etc the bands can be found easily with followers and downloads so they can be signed up. This suggests a fan base in place, which is the nearest you can get to a sure thing in music.
With the pleasure of hearing live music, seeing bands & singers doing it live then why bother with illegal downloads & ruin the risk of a criminal record.
About the Author:
You choose to have the best stroke treatment for your restorative healing to be superb. A mini stroke gives you some time to get health care.
0 comments:
Post a Comment